Nicholas Sparks: Good Novels Suck.
Nicholas Sparks shares some, er, opinions:
“Hemingway. See, they’re recommending The Garden of Eden, and I read that. It was published after he was dead. It’s a weird story about this honeymoon couple, and a third woman gets involved. Uh, it’s not my cup of tea.” Sparks pulls the one beside it off the shelf. “A Farewell to Arms, by Hemingway. Good stuff. That’s what I write,” he says, putting it back. “That’s what I write.”
Cormac McCarthy? “Horrible,” he says, looking at Blood Meridian. “This is probably the most pulpy, overwrought, melodramatic cowboy vs. Indians story ever written.”
Even hearing a passage about a sunset in which “the mountains in their blue islands stood footless in the void like floating temples” doesn’t sway him.
Cyrus pipes up: “The Catcher in the Rye. That’s my favorite book.” She smiles. J.D. Salinger’s classic may be, by law, every 17-year-old’s favorite book.
Sparks’; favorite tale of youth? “I think A Walk to Remember,” he says, citing his own novel. “That’s my version of a coming-of-age.” He pauses and adds: “You have to say To Kill a Mockingbird is an all-time classic.”
3 Comments
Oh completely. This is why we always hear Nicholas Sparks and Hemmingway mentioned in the same breath.
Note to authors: if people aren’t comfortable referring to you by your last name only, either your last name is Smith or you’re not important enough to merit being referred to by your last name. Corollary to this: if you can be referred to by your first name alone by people who don’t know you, you’re important but in fifteen years, no one will care.
Come on, The Dane…you have read the latest Sparks, right?
Wait, there’s more??
Comments are now closed for this article.