Some primary schools in the U.K. recently espoused a “no best friends policy,” a move that mirrors practices described in a 2010 article of The New York Times: “A Best Friend? You Must Be Kidding.” Both plans illustrate anxiety with the exclusivity that comes with best friendships and seek to discourage those tight bonds to avoid bullying, cliques, and the pain that can accompany friendship “breakups.” While I agree that educators should encourage children to work with different people and to practice respect and kindness, I think there are several problems with the elimination of the “best friend.” For one thing, forcing some children to socialize only in large groups will mean that those children don’t really socialize at all; this policy smacks of extroversion, and for children who are introverted or reserved, a close friend can be the sole comfort that makes large group interactions possible. Such a policy could prohibit introverted children from learning how to work with large groups, whereas a close friend could actually facilitate that process.

A Slate article titled “The Buddy System” speaks to this issue as particularly critical for middle-school boys, for whom a single close friend can ease any number of adolescent transitions. Of course, as any grown-up knows, friendships come and go, and the demise (especially of tight-knit bonds) can be incredibly painful at every age and stage of life. But prohibiting children from forming close friendships (if such a prohibition is even possible) doesn’t teach people how to practice—or dissolve—intimacy with compassion and love. Nor does it teach young people that principle of loving our neighbors, even when we like some of them significantly more than others. To me, it rings false to pretend that we relate to and like everyone the same amount; it seems natural to prefer the company of some over the company of others. The lesson within that natural tendency should not be exclusiveness or wholesale inclusion but recognition of different temperaments and gifts and a respect for each individual.

Of course, I come to this topic as an introvert, married to an introvert (who wonders how he found a spouse even more introverted than him) with a child who expresses definite introverted tendencies. I see my toddler’s intense attachment to a few people in her life, as well as her evident discomfort in crowds and large social groups. I need to teach her friendliness in a way that some parents don’t have to think about (their kids smile, apparently, without a ton of coaching), and I work on strategies to help her in contexts where there are a lot of people. If her father and I are any indication, she can learn to survive those contexts, but she won’t ever enjoy them or flourish in them. And most likely she will rely on a few key relationships in her life to help her navigate a social space that feels contrived, superficial, and cold. Institutional policies that require us all to serve as interchangeable parts miss the point that we are gifted differently to serve differently. That’s the body. Some members may thrive in the thick of the social scene, but for some of us, those “best friends” are the lifelines that equip us to mingle at all.


  1. Don’cha just hate it when policies smack of extroversion?

    Speaking as someone who was once an introverted middle-school boy, one or two best friends was crucial to my surviving middle school (and more importantly, junior high) with any kind of hope in the possible goodness of mankind. Actually, not much has changed in the 20 years since.

    I will also add, I’m very much an Anglophile and love being so, but how unsurprising is it that this policy is being enacted in primary schools in the U.K., where educators since the dawn of time have enjoyed employing things which smack?

  2. Friendship break ups can be brutal! I experienced a few of those back then. As an introvert needing steady relationships, those were deeply painful losses. But the pain was pointed and specific, not long term and ongoing. Without the steadiness of the friendships day in, day out, I think the long-term pain would have been much worse on my psyche.

    This sounds like an attempt to craft a painless world, one that isn’t possible until Jesus makes all things new in the age to come. Certainly, I would rather experience less pain than more . . . but making rules and regulations for relationships will not prevent relational pain without increasing our isolation, and that has it’s own measure of pain. Sort of like trading one kind of pain for another?

  3. As an introverted man who has a grown introverted daughter, I can affirm that a small collection of “best friends” in the school years spelled survival for me and, I am pretty certain, for my daughter.

    We introverts are not always shy; we just process life differently. We do not thrive on over-stimulation. We need time and space to think things through, and the world needs our thoughtfulness. Those extroverted “experts” could learn a good bit from listening to some of us (smile).

    Let’s hope that a few of them listen to you, Erin.

Comments are now closed for this article.