Monthly Archives: April 2014

Post-evangelicals are still operating within evangelical paradigms.

You rip your shirt off, raise your arms and run, but as if trying to escape something dreadful.

Stewart’s satire makes at least one valid point: not everyone who professes Christianity—or works for Fox News—knows the Bible as well as they think they do.

The apocalypse isn’t about Isaac Clarke or a militant dictator or a fanatical religious cult. It’s a display of the glory of God by way of His intersection with the imperfect.

We take time and effort to break up intentionally, but we’re still alright with “falling in love.”

If the past has nothing to offer us other than dire examples of how to ruin everything then why are we trying to relive it through our wardrobes?

All clandestinely taken nude pics, whether they’re sexy or silly, treat an ensouled being like a piece of meat—like something of no more consequence than any other random jumble of molecules.

The question we must each answer for ourselves is: “Should we avoid vulnerability until marriage in order to avoid heartbreak?”

Part of identifying with a faith such as ours is an acceptance of the idiom, of all the community’s idiosyncratic terms and symbols.

‘The Broken Circle Breakdown’ will challenge you to consider how your own beliefs will come into play when you face suffering.

We can safely call the infanticide arguments from Giubilini, Minerva, Tooley, and Singer what we’ve known them to be all along: immoral nonsense that needs to stop.

The application of makeup or the styling of hair can be performed along the grain of creation.

The Eich controversy is a firm reminder of the necessity for tough, expensive grace in our lives, relationships, and conversations, especially when it comes to such heated issues as gay marriage and LGBT rights.